| In my
experience, meanness has been a symptom, not a state of being. I've
met very few truly mean people, and those I have met have also been rather
miserable people. Scrooge was mean, and Scrooge was very unhappy,
miserable, even--pathetic. But Scrooge changed, and he changed when
he was shown just how his own actions were affecting other people's image
of him. They despised him, and Scrooge was truly unloved, a state I
wouldn't wish on anyone. But if meanness is a symptom, why do so few
mean people get help? Why don't they examine the problem that
meanness is a symptom of, and then work on that problem?
I believe that
it's because being mean feels good in a certain way. It's a powerful
way of behaving that tends to make other people react in ways that they
really wouldn't react otherwise. Meanness is a method of domination,
and it's a domination that has the cards stacked in your favor when you're
mean, for so few people are willing (or even able) to react in kind when
you're mean to them. Redfield touches on the dynamic in The
Celestine Prophecy, in the context of a power exchange. The
dominating person diminishes the power of the submitting person and
therefore gains power him or herself; the mean person diminishes the power
of the person he or she is being mean to and therefore gains that
power. It's a rush, almost like a drug--"look how i can make
this person so uncomfortable."
One of my
favorite stories in the Chicken Soup for the Soul series has to do
with a large, drunk young man getting on a subway train in Japan. He
starts to push and threaten people, and the author of the piece thought
that he would have to fight the man. But then an old man speaks
kindly to the young man, inviting him to sit down and talk, and within
minutes, the large young man is lying on the bench with his head in the
old man's lap, crying as the old man strokes his face. It's an
incredible lesson, one that I think about often. When I see
meanness, I try to think of the hurting in the person being mean.
Pain may explain
mean behavior, but it certainly doesn't excuse it. The problem,
though, often lies in the role models a person has had, and how loved or
unloved the person feels. If I feel you love me, I may consider your
role modeling when I decide on a certain behavior. If you're afraid
of me or if you avoid me, though, I'm not going to use you as a role
model. I'll use the powerful people as role models, the people who
have control in their lives, the people who dominate others.
How can we show
love to someone who's being mean or cruel? It's very difficult to do
so--it's always more difficult to love those who most need our love.
They're simply not lovable. But in refusing or neglecting to love
them, we tend to perpetuate their behavior indirectly, and we have to
consider that some of their meanness is the responsibility of the
community that surrounds them yet neglects them. Martin Luther
King's line from his "Letter from the Birmingham Jail" is very
relevant here, as it is in many other situations: "We will have
to repent in this generation not merely for the vitriolic words and
actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good
people." In another context, he refers to the bad as
"people of darkness" and the good as "people of the
light."
Can we be people
of the light if we don't try to help pull others from the darkness?
Can we truly call ourselves human if we don't try to help other humans who
are hurting? I struggle with this question constantly, and I truly
don't know how I can help others who don't even seem to want my
help. But I have to try. I have to try to find the needs, to
recognize the needs, and I have to try to give love, even if it's thrown
back in my face. For even if it's thrown back at me a hundred times,
it may be accepted on that one hundred and first time, and then there will
be just that bit less meanness in the world, and the world will be just
that bit closer to being healed. |